Friday, March 13, 2026

James J Hulsey married an Indian

Marriages between the American Colonists and Native Americans
 
Marriage licenses laws were quite complicated even at best among the first colonial people and especially with Native Americans. They had a different set of spiritual beliefs. Lots of laws were enacted and many changes occurred over the ensuing 300 years.
 
Unfortunately, there were all kinds of Anti-miscegentation laws back then. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-miscegenation_laws_in_the_United_States#Colonial_era
All anti-miscegenation laws banned marriage between whites and non-white groups, primarily black people, but often also Native Americans and Asian Americans. In many states, anti-miscegenation laws also criminalized cohabitation and sex between whites and non-whites.
 
https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark:/67531/metadc2191672/m2/1/high_res_d/1928-v6-n3_a04.pdf
Laws began to change in the late 1700’s and evolved well into the 1800s
Record keeping was difficult and many marriages were left unrecorded.
 
https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/marriage-in-early-virginia-indian-society/
The English colonists who founded Jamestown in 1607 tended to disapprove of customs other than their own, and they saw the Powhatans’ marriage customs and sexual practices as particular proof of their need to be converted to Christianity.
 
Robert F. Berkhofer Jr., Salvation and the Savage: An Analysis of Protestant Missions and American Indian Response, 1787–1862 (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1965);
Unquestionably, there was resistance to missionary efforts. In that way, English common law and Biblical codes were imposed on the relations between Native American men and women.
 
https://www.genealogymagazine.com/cherokee-white-intermarriages-citizenship-by-intermarriage-in-the-cherokee-nation/
Very interesting article
Before the 1870s, many Cherokee-white unions were informal or common law. Though an Act of Cherokee Council passed on 15 October 1855 required a marriage license, some couples continued the earlier practice of having a so-called Indian style marriage
 
Laws of the Cherokee Nation, Passed During the Years 1839—1867, Compiled by the Authority of the National Council (St. Louis: Missouri Democrat Print, 1868), pp. 104-105, which states: “any unmarried white male wishing to marry a Cherokee woman was required to obtain a marriage license from one of the district courts in one of the several districts, provided he had first paid a fee, taken an oath to the Cherokee Nation, and presented the district clerks with “a certificate of good moral character, signed by at least seven respectable Cherokee citizens.”
 
https://michaelkleen.com/2016/11/14/colonial-intimacies-a-revealing-look-at-american-indian-marriage-in-new-england/
Divorce and inheritance were two areas in which Puritan and Christian-Indian courts took an active role. A legal effort was needed to prove inheritance and property. Although many American Indians continued to practice what the English recognized as common-law marriages, when it came to separation, those marriages proved complicated. By the 1700s colonial courts demanded proof of a formal ceremony or cohabitation in litigation regarding marriage.

Thursday, March 12, 2026

Third and Fourth Generation Hulsey Wives

 Possible Cherokee Ancestry

Third and Fourth Generation Hulsey Wives

Cherokee and White Cultural Relations:
As the whites settled western North Carolina, many of the Cherokee moved further westward. In Burke Co., NC, the Cherokee boundary was Black Mountain at the western edge of Burke County. Some Cherokee remained in isolated homesteads east of the boundary. The Cherokees east of the boundary begin to take on the cultural traits of their white neighbors, including white names in addition to their Cherokee names. There was one major difference, however. The Cherokee men were skilled hunters, and as game disappeared, were slow to learn agricultural skills. Their white neighbors were much more skilled in agriculture. A young Cherokee woman found many more eligible white men in her community and the Whites were much wealthier (comparably) than the Cherokees. Thus, Cherokee women entered into unions with white men.

In SC in the 1790’s Greenville Dist., SC was bordered on the west by the Cherokees and in the early 1800’s the Cherokee boundary was the western boundary of Franklin and Jackson Counties in Georgia until 1820. The same issue applied.

The union of a white man and an Indian woman generally was not recognized as a legal marriage because a Minister or Judge would not marry a Christian to a non-Christian and an Indian was not, by GA law at that time, a Christian. This attitude did not begin to change until well into the 1830’s. In the case of the Hulsey families, these unions generally lasted a lifetime. A person of mixed blood was judged to be white biased on their cultural traits more so than their ancestry.

After the Louisiana Purchase was completed, the United States Government encouraged Cherokees in the eastern homeland to immigrate to Arkansas to join the Old Settlers that had emigrated after the end of the Revolutionary War. In the 1820’s and 1830’s many persons of Cherokee ancestry joined the Arkansas Cherokees before the Trail of Tears forced removal. If a person immigrated to western or northwestern Arkansas, it is likely that the emigrant had some measure of Cherokee ancestry.

In GA the Cherokee Nation attracted persons of Cherokee ancestry before the Cherokee Removal of 1837-1839. This area included (now) Paulding and Polk Counties. A person of some Cherokee ancestry or a Cherokee wife could settle vacant land. Some persons, including members of the Hulsey family, later moved to the Cherokee Nation.
Screening Standard:
1. Notation or Citation of Ancestry or
2. No Marriage License shown – Month, Year, Date., and
3. No First Name (NFN) and/or No Maiden Name (NMN), and/or
4. Parentage not found, and
5. Husband living in Western NC, Upstate SC or Northeastern GA in the period 1750 – 1837 at beginning of the relationship, and/or
6. Children emigrated to western GA, Alabama, Arkansas or Indian Territory.

 Summary:
One of the issues in conducting this study is that both the third and fourth generations were illiterate until 1840 or after. Very few family records, other than Marriage Licenses and Land Deeds, were kept until the fifth generation.
Of the five Hulsey brothers that came to GA in 1800-1809, all had first wives that may have been of Cherokee ancestry. One, Adler, married two wives that may have been of Cherokee ancestry. There was no issue from the second marriage.
The fourth generation contained 55 persons. At least eighteen (18) persons of this generation married persons that may have been of Cherokee ancestry. 

Sunday, March 8, 2026

Location of the Four Hulsey Brothers

 http://hulseyheadhuff.net/james_hulsey.html


The Hulsey Family lived close to one another during much of their lives between 1800 and 1810. James, Charles III, Jesse, Adonijah and Adler all lived on Franklin County (now Banks County) east of and adjacent to then Jackson Co, now Hall Co. Adonijah moved to then Jackson Co., now Hall County by 1812. Charles III moved to TN 1810 and later to AR.
The map shows the locations of the home farms of the four Hulsey Brothers after their moves to Hall Co., GA:

Where Did They Go?

The third generation of the Hulsey family generally lived close together during much of their lives. They all lived within ten miles of one another until Charles III migrated first to TN and later to AR. The other four, James J., Jesse, Sr., Adonijah and Adler, all died in Hall Co., GA., living within 5 miles of each other.


Sunday, February 22, 2026

Jesus Holds All of Our Tomorrows

 We Ought to Say – “If the Lord Wills”

James 4:13-15

God sees down the road and around the corner. He is always there before we even think about going. In theological terms we call this God’s omniscience and God’s foreknowledge, what comfort it is to know Jesus holds all of our tomorrows.

Saturday, February 21, 2026

Short Bio of Martha Dandridge Washington

                                            Martha Washington — America’s First Lady
                                                                            1731–1802
                                                                     Written by Randal Rust

Martha Washington, Biography, Facts, Significance, APUSH


                                                                        Martha Washington. Image Source: Wikipedia.

Martha Dandridge was born on June 2, 1731, in New Kent County, Virginia. She grew up in a traditional 18th-century household and received an education that focused on domestic skills and academics. When she was 18, she married Daniel Parke Custis, a wealthy plantation owner who was significantly older than her. Together, they had four children, but two of them died in infancy.

In 1757, Martha became a widow when Custis died, leaving her with substantial wealth and the responsibility of caring for their two surviving children. It was during this time that she caught the attention of a rising military and political figure named George Washington.

Martha and George Washington were married on January 6, 1759, marking the beginning of their lifelong partnership. As George’s military and political career progressed, Martha supported him both privately and publicly. During the American Revolutionary War, she joined him at military encampments such as Valley Forge, Morristown, and Newburgh.

After the war and the ratification of the United States Constitution, George Washington was elected as the First President of the United States. Martha, known as the First Lady, embraced her role as a gracious hostess and supported her husband during his presidency. She lived with him in New York City and then Philadelphia.

Following his second term as president, Martha and George retired to Mount Vernon. Among their visitors were the Marquis de Lafayette and Catharine Macauley.

Unfortunately, President Washington passed away in 1799, leaving Martha a widow for the second time. She outlived her husband by a few years and passed away on May 22, 1802, in the presence of her granddaughter.

Martha Washington is important to United States history because of the role she played as the wife of George Washington, the first President of the United States. During the American Revolutionary War, she supported her husband, joining him at military encampments and helping provide comfort to the soldiers. As the nation’s first First Lady, she established the social customs and expectations for the position. 

Friday, February 20, 2026

Short Bio of George Washington

 

Short Bio for George Washington

https://share.america.gov/how-george-washington-became-father-of-his-country/

Article written on February 11, 2026

 


                                        https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/George-Washington-Portrait-Stuart.webp

Like the monument standing in the U.S. capital that bears his name, George Washington’s place in American history is towering. As a general, his commanding presence inspired the Army that won independence from Britain. As a statesman, he presided over the Constitutional Convention that shaped the United States. And as the country’s first president he established lasting traditions, forging a reputation as “the father of his country.”

Washington’s journey to greatness was no coincidence. When he showed up for the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia in his militia uniform in 1775, Washington helped the other delegates to see him as a natural choice for Army commander.

Though he resigned his commission after the Revolution, he stayed involved in political affairs, arguing for a stronger national government. This made him a natural choice to lead the Constitutional Convention. “He was the moving force for the Constitution,” says Edward J. Larson, a law professor at Pepperdine University and author of George Washington, Nationalist. Other delegates had trust in Washington, according to Larson, and that trust moved the effort along. Washington’s central role in developing the Constitution, in turn, would make him a favorite choice for president among the leaders in attendance.

Early Life

Washington was born on February 22, 1732, in Westmoreland County, Virginia. He was the first child of Augustine and Mary Washington, who would have five more children. At the time George was born, they lived in Pope’s Creek. Raised in Virginia by his mother and brother, Washington succeeded as a surveyor on the state’s frontier.

In 1735, the family moved to Little Hunting Creek Plantation, on the Potomac River. The Plantation would eventually be renamed Mount Vernon. They lived there for a short time, and moved to Ferry Farm on the Rappahannock River, across from Fredericksburg, Virginia, in 1738. Washington spent most of his youth at Ferry Farm, although very little is known about his childhood.

 

His father died when he was 11, and he became the ward of Lawrence Washington, his half-brother. Augustine had three children with his first wife, Jane, who died in 1729. Lawrence inherited Little Hunting Creek Plantation. Lawrence was married to Anne Fairfax, the daughter of Colonel William Fairfax. Fairfax had political connections and had been an appointee of the British Crown in the Bahamas and the Colonies.

At the of 16, in 1748, Washington helped survey Virginia’s western frontier. He spent the next few years surveying land and received an appointment as the official surveyor of Culpepper County, Virginia.

He inherited Mount Vernon in 1752. Lawrence died in July from tuberculosis. Soon after, his only heir, his daughter Sarah, also died. This left the estate to Washington. He was 20 years old at the time. Adding to his responsibilities, Virginia’s Lieutenant Governor, Robert Dinwiddie, appointed him as major in the Virginia militia.

 As a young militia leader in the French and Indian War (1754–1763), he overcame early setbacks and led British forces to safety during the Battle of the Monongahela after their general was mortally wounded.

Washington’s heroics — surviving the Monongahela, despite four bullets passing through his coat made him an obvious choice to lead the Continental Army in the American Revolution. Believing in his own suitability for the job and arriving at the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia wearing his militia uniform, Washington inspired confidence. The Congress founded the U.S. Army on June 14, 1775, and named him commander in chief the next day.

The next year, on Christmas night 1776, Washington led his soldiers, weary from defeats, across the freezing Delaware River for a surprise attack that brought victory and a morale boost for his men. A few years later, in 1781, Washington deceived the British into anticipating an attack in New York and instead moved south to Virginia, capturing thousands of British troops at Yorktown.

On March 15, 1783, in Newburgh, New York, officers under Washington’s command met to discuss whether to mutiny because the Continental Congress had not paid them. Instead of having them arrested, Washington came to address them. He began reading his prepared speech, which would chide the conspirators. At some point he paused to put on his glasses, saying, “Gentlemen, you must pardon me, for I have not only grown gray but almost blind in service to my country.”

By that action, the conspiracy died. Later that year, Washington resigned his commission as commander of the Continental Army. When British King George III was informed that Washington would resign, rather than take over leadership of the new country, he was reported to have said, “If he does that, he will be the greatest man in the world.”

Yet in 1789, Washington was unanimously elected the first U.S. president. His decision to serve only two four-year terms set a precedent that lasted more than a century and influenced a 1951 constitutional amendment that set a two-term limit for future presidents.

At his funeral in 1799, Washington’s friend Henry “Light-Horse Harry” Lee described him  as, “First in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen.”

Thursday, February 19, 2026

Washington Became 'The Father of His Country'

 

George Washington (center, right) is portrayed in Howard Chandler Christy’s painting of the signing of the U.S. Constitution in Philadelphia, September 17, 1787. (Architect of the Capitol/Howard Chandler Christy)

How George Washington became 'the father of his country' - ShareAmerica

Article by Charles Hoskinson

Feb 11, 2026

Like the monument standing in the U.S. capital that bears his name, George Washington’s place in American history is towering.

As a general, his commanding presence inspired the Army that won independence from Britain. As a statesman, he presided over the Constitutional Convention that shaped the United States. And as the country’s first president he established lasting traditions, forging a reputation as “the father of his country.”

Washington’s journey to greatness was no coincidence.

When he showed up for the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia in his militia uniform in 1775, Washington helped the other delegates to see him as a natural choice for Army commander.

Though he resigned his commission after the Revolution, he stayed involved in political affairs, arguing for a stronger national government. This made him a natural choice to lead the Constitutional Convention.

“He was the moving force for the Constitution,” says Edward J. Larson, a law professor at Pepperdine University and author of George Washington, Nationalist. Other delegates had trust in Washington, according to Larson, and that trust moved the effort along.

Washington’s central role in developing the Constitution, in turn, would make him a favorite choice for president among the leaders in attendance.


James Birtley McNair compiled McNair History

                                                                                McNair Quote As long as marriages are recorded, births re...